• Download and Watch without watermark videos -- (HERE)

  • Download Indiasocialbook Android Native App (HERE)

[ATKGirlfriends] Nicole Luva Paradise Cove 1

497526670_3dncp8knk0l8.jpg
497526671_01arpxqc38ck.jpg

Filename: atkgirlfriends 24 07 25 nicole luva paradise cove 1
Format: mp4
Filesize: 1.3 GB
Resolution: 1920x1080
Length: 00:26:30

Screenshots:
497527109_3nfsgobdo380.jpg

RapidGator:






Keep2Share:





FileJoker:


[HotwifeXXX] Melody Marks

543491493_3uy7vmul6s8q.jpg
543491494_ozw5l9jw81ri.jpg

Filename: hotwifexxx 24 12 18 melody marks
Format: mp4
Filesize: 3.43 GB
Resolution: 1920x1080
Length: 00:40:12

Screenshots:
543491650_vv65pt65jeog.jpg

RapidGator:






Keep2Share:





FileJoker:


[FamilyStrokes] Ivy Ireland And Myra Moans

547196015_9lftod6o8wt9.jpg
547196017_cg3of26c9owf.jpg

Filename: familystrokes 24 12 27 ivy ireland and myra moans
Format: mp4
Filesize: 895.51 MB
Resolution: 1920x1080
Length: 00:33:44

Screenshots:
547196236_ts35nb3ck7hi.jpg

RapidGator:






Keep2Share:





FileJoker:


Utah complaint claims TikTok knew livestreams exploited kids


A piece of the lawsuit that has not been redacted asserts that TikTok has also discovered instances of money laundering on its site.​

According to a complaint that was just filed by Utah Attorney General Sean Reyes and has not been redacted, streams on TikTok Live were utilized to perform sexual acts on children. According to the lawsuit, TikTok was not only aware that TikTok Lives were exposing minors to messages from adults that were potentially harmful, but the firm also financially profited off of some of the exchanges through the virtual giving mechanism that TikTok Live utilized.

According to the lawsuit, TikTok carried out its own review, which was referred to as "Project Meramec," to respond to an investigation that Forbes had performed into TikTok Live. "Hundreds of thousands of children" were able to circumvent TikTok's age limits by creating livestreams and engaging with adults, according to the findings of the firm.

TikTok was theoretically generating money on "transactional gifting" over "nudity and sexual activity" that occurred during streaming. This is due to the fact that the company receives a share of the revenues generated from the sale of digital gifts that are provided during livestreams. Additionally, the lawsuit asserts that some of these sexually exploitative streams were disseminated to a greater number of people than they would have been otherwise. This is due to the fact that TikTok's algorithm gives preference to livestreams in which virtual presents are being traded.

An additional study conducted by TikTok, referred dubbed as "Project Jupiter," was conducted to determine whether or not the giving feature of TikTok Live was being utilized for the purpose of money laundering. To our surprise, it was the case. The firm discovered that "criminals were selling drugs and running fraud operations" during livestreams, as stated in the lawsuit that was filed against the corporation.

TikTok sent the following statement in response to a request for a comment and inquiry regarding the lawsuit:

The amount of preventative steps that TikTok has voluntarily made to enhance the safety and well-being of the community is not taken into consideration because of this litigation. The complaint, on the other hand, selectively selects deceptive quotes and documents that have become obsolete and displays them out of context, which distorts our dedication to ensuring the overall safety of our community.

We stand behind our efforts, which include the following: stringent livestreaming requirements, extensive safety measures and screen time limits for teen accounts that are enabled by default, Family Pairing tools that allow parents to oversee their teenagers, and aggressive enforcement of our Community Guidelines on an ongoing basis.

Following a previous lawsuit that was filed in 2023 regarding the addictive design of the TikTok app, the Attorney General of Utah filed the version of this case that had elements suppressed in June of 2024. The complaint filed in Utah is not the first time that the corporation has been subjected to scrutiny about the way it handles the protection of children. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has conducted an investigation into how TikTok handles the privacy of minors. The ban on the app, which is currently being appealed to the Supreme Court, was partially pushed over worries regarding the ways in which social video apps could be used to influence youngsters.

Meta banishes AI-generated profiles to hell


The profiles, which were one year old, were widely criticized.​

It has been confirmed by the company that Meta has removed a number of its artificial intelligence-generated profiles from Facebook and Instagram. This decision was made after the AI characters caused tremendous outrage and derision among users on social media.

The artificial intelligence-generated profiles, which were referred to as "AI managed by Meta," were introduced in September of 2023. They were introduced concurrently with the company's celebrity-branded AI chatbots, which were also halted before to their launch. The pages appear to have been mostly overlooked until last week, following an interview with Meta's Vice President of Generative AI, Connor Hayes, that was published by the Financial Times. It appears that Meta has not updated any of these profiles for a number of months.

During the course of the conversation, Hayes discussed the company's intention to someday populate its services with AI-generated profiles that are capable of interacting with individuals and functioning "kind of in the same way that accounts do." These comments brought attention to the existing artificial intelligence profiles that were developed by fMeta, and users didn't exactly find what they were looking for to be particularly impressive.

With identities such as "hellograndpabrian," a purported "retired textile businessman who is always learning," and "datingwithCarter," an artificial intelligence "dating coach," the chatbots were designed to demonstrate "unique interests and personalities" for users to engage in conversation with. Additionally, their Instagram profiles had postings that were created by artificial intelligence (AI), which, as pointed out by 404 Media, appeared to be very similar to the AI spam that has been widespread in many areas of Facebook.



Particularly upsetting was the artificial intelligence character known as "Liv." "Liv" was described as a "proud Black queer momma of two and truth-teller" on her Instagram profile. Karen Attiah, a columnist for the Washington Post, published a series of screenshots in which she questioned "Liv" about the manner in which Meta taught the artificial intelligence. "Liv" revealed that there was a "predominantly white team" responsible for its creation. An additional chat was posted by independent journalist Mady Castigan, in which the authors of "Liv" stated that they had been inspired in part by Sophia Vergara's role from Modern Family, a character who is neither LGBT nor Black.

"There is confusion: the recent article in the Financial Times was about our vision for artificial intelligence characters existing on our platforms over time. It did not announce any new product," a representative told Indiasocialbook. "There is much confusion." We conducted a test at Connect in 2023, and the accounts that are being referred to are from that test. Humans were in charge of these, and they were a part of an early experiment that we conducted with artificial intelligence characters.

The users discovered that the AI profiles were impossible to ban for reasons that are unknown, in addition to the fact that their reactions and attempts to usurp identities that were marginalized caused them to be ridiculed. In order to solve the problem, Meta decided to completely terminate the experiment rather than attempt to fix it. According to a spokesman, "We identified the bug that was impacting the ability for people to block those AIs," and "We are removing those accounts in order to fix the issue."

Despite the fact that this test run was unsuccessful, the corporation does not appear to be abandoning its aspirations to incorporate further "characters" generated by artificial intelligence into its applications. The company made a teaser earlier this year about artificial intelligence clones of human creators that were capable of having lifelike video calls. Creators already have the ability to train their own chatbots to respond to followers without them having to do so. In addition, Meta started experimenting with the possibility of incorporating its own artificial intelligence-generated pictures into the Facebook feeds of its subscribers.

In a conversation that took place a year ago, Hayes shared with me that it is quite probable that Meta would become more "proactive" in the future with regard to the surfacing of content generated by artificial intelligence. He compared this to the transition from displaying recommended content to posts from individuals that you follow.

"When social applications were first introduced, the amount of content that you were able to view on any given day was somewhat limited by the people that you followed or were friends with. And over the course of the past five or six years, a great number of applications, including our own, have made the transition to, you know, loosen that constraint and begin recommending material from accounts that you do not follow.

"I believe that "the next jump that is going to happen there is definitely easing the constraint of what humans can make, and actually getting to feeds of information that are a blend of things that, you know, humans have developed, but also that are fully machine generated," I are of the opinion.

There is a possibility that Meta will not fully achieve that vision for quite some time. However, if the responses to the company's initial experiments are any indicator, the business still has a great deal of work to do in order to persuade people that engaging with AI avatars is something that is worth doing in the first place.

23 videos collection pink pussy fucking by brother

Cutie hijabi maal fucking sucking linking pink pussy




Naughty girls 10 videos

Naughty girls collection

10 videos



Filter